We offer links to disaster information and have a large archive of astronomy articles for our readers. There is a quick over view of a disaster map in the video listed below:
Watch this quick video for more information:
We offer links to disaster information and have a large archive of astronomy articles for our readers. There is a quick over view of a disaster map in the video listed below:
Watch this quick video for more information:
The exploration of our own moon will continue with an ambitious mission called Chandrayaan-2, a collaboration between the Indian Space Research Organization and Roscosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency. The mission, which will be launched in 2012 or 2013, will be a follow-up to the Chandrayaan-1 mission, India’s first mission to the moon, which has provided us with excellent data about the possibility of frozen water there- see our article at this site. Whereas Chandrayaan-1 consists of a lunar orbiter, the second mission will have an orbiter and a lander (or maybe two, as we shall see in a moment) to conduct in situ investigations of the lunar surface.
It will be a landmark of cooperation between India and Russia in the area of space exploration, just one more example of the new spirit of openness and interaction between nations in this field. If you go to the website of the Indian Space Research Organization and click on “International Cooperation,” you will find a sentence that sums it all up:
“India has always recognised that space has a dimension beyond national considerations, which can only be addressed by international partners.”
Chandrayaan-2 is an excellent example of this post-Cold War attitude. But it is more than just a symbol; this mission will do good science. It will teach us some things about a body that still has a surprising number of questions associated with it: our own satellite.
Your eyebrows may have risen slightly as you read that last line. “What?” you may ask. “Don’t we already know plenty about it? After all, we’ve actually been there! We have moon rocks! What more do we need?”
Well, let’s put it this way: Imagine an alien civilization that has never visited Earth, and wants to know something about it. After great effort and expense, they finally manage to land an expedition on our planet. They hop out, knock a few golf balls around, and gather up a boxful of rocks. Then they go home, and never come back.
Now, how much do you think our hypothetical aliens could learn about our planet from that? Granted, the analogy has some rather large holes in it, since we really can learn a lot about the moon, or any body, just by observing it from afar. Due to recent technological advances, we can now gather quite a bit of information without actually going there.
But no matter how much we learn from a distance, there will always be questions that can only be answered by going there, and a boxful of rocks is only the beginning. That fundamental fact is the rationale behind further exploration of the moon.
For the time being, that exploration can be conducted by our robot probes, which will learn more about the environments of the moon and other bodies in the solar system. Human beings will follow later.
Some of the specific things that we are trying to learn about the moon relate to the ambition of putting permanent bases there, while other things simply have to do with understanding how the moon formed, and what it can tell us about the early days of the solar system. At the moment, we have some really good theories about how the moon came into being. The bad thing about theories is, they don’t mean diddly without some evidence to back them up. Now that we have the theories, we’re trying to get the evidence.
The leading theory about how the moon came into being is that early in the lifetime of our planet, it was struck by a body roughly the size of Mars. (Luckily, there was nothing living here at the time- this was so long ago, even dinosaurs were science fiction.) The resulting cataclysm was beyond our feeble imagining; the entire planet literally reeled from it, and an enormous amount of material was thrown up. While some of this material fell back to Earth, a large portion of it went into orbit, and eventually coalesced into a single body. That body is the moon.
(This is a great oversimplification of this theory, a full discussion of which would keep you reading for weeks. If you want more info, go to the NASA website and search for “Earth’s moon.”)
The scanty evidence that we have- that box of rocks- seems to bear this out. The moon rocks brought back in 1969 all have a lower percentage of iron than Earth rocks do. This makes sense, if you think about it. Iron is one of the heavier substances that would have been thrown up by that ancient impact. In the impact scenario, you would expect the heavier substances to fall back to Earth, while the relatively light ones would achieve orbit and get incorporated into the moon. The result is a rocky body that has less iron than Earth does.
OK, so we’ve got a nice little theory, and we’ve got some evidence that seems to support it. So far, so good— but the truth is, we’ve only got that one box of rocks, and they were all collected from a single place. How do we know they’re typical? Maybe that area was anomalous, and not representative of the entire moon. Besides, the theory just tells us how the moon got started. After that happened, there was a whole process of evolution that transformed a cloud of loose particles into a spherical body. If we could collect samples from many locations all over the moon, from both the surface and from various depths below the surface, then maybe we could learn something about that process.
That box of rocks is starting to look pretty inadequate now, isn’t it? To understand this body and how it got to be like it is today, we need a whole lot more samples and a lot more work. And this stuff isn’t just abstract science. While we’re going to keep exploring the moon by unmanned means for a while yet, we are aiming for a permanent human presence there eventually. We’re talking colonies, not just outposts.
That dream is now a lot closer to reality than it once was, and part of the reason is the first of these Indian moon probes, Chandrayaan-1. As we saw in our earlier article, that spacecraft participated in observations which have shown the presence of minute amounts of water on the lunar surface. This isn’t just frozen water; the molecules are apparently being made by the action of sunlight bombarding hydrogen-rich rocks. This has enormous implications for future colonizing efforts, and the fact that Chandrayaan-1 took part in the observations that revealed it is certainly a feather in the cap of the ISRO. The second probe, Chandrayaan-2, will expand on this knowledge by putting down a lander and collecting some samples. This will be the beginning of the in-depth investigation into the composition and evolution of the moon.
In discussing this mission, it should be noted that things are still in the planning stage, and details are not firm yet. If you go to the ISRO website, you will find several pages relating to this mission, and they all give different projected launch times, ranging from 2011 to 2013. Besides this, the exact equipment to be included in this mission also seems to be uncertain, with some pages saying that there will be one rover, provided by Roscosmos, and other pages saying that there will also be an Indian mini-rover. In some places, the lander/rover are spoken of as if they will be a single unit, while other places talk of them as separate pieces of equipment. When we start looking at projects that are as much as three years away, it’s not surprising that the details are a bit hazy yet. We’ll have to wait a while to get more definite and specific information.
However, there are a few points that are certain. Chandrayaan-2 will be launched from India’s Sriharikota launch facility aboard a Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV). While this is primarily an Indian and Russian collaboration, there will be some instruments provided by NASA and the European Space Agency. Once the orbiter is in orbit around the moon, the lander will detach and land near one of the lunar poles. The rover (at least the larger one) will be designed by Roscosmos, and will be powered by solar panels, possibly augmented by a nuclear power source. The lifetime of this rover will be variable; while some web pages give the projected lifetime as only a month, others say that it may be extended for as much as a year. As with other details of this mission, this one is still uncertain.
Even if the rover is only roving for a short time, it will be able to cover a lot of distance. It has a maximum speed of 360 mph (rough terrain will decrease this, of course) and should be able to visit several different locations, so that a wide variety of dust and rock samples can be collected.
This is a good mission; it will provide us with the kind of basic scientific information that is absolutely necessary for an eventual human presence on the moon. It may also help us to understand how the moon formed in the first place, which relates to the bigger questions of solar research: how did the solar system get here, and what was the process that made it?
The moon landing in 1969 was more a matter of national prestige than a scientific mission: we went to beat the Soviets. This whole mindset, while it may have had some relevance in that long-ago time, seems quaint and silly to us now. When people go to the moon again, it will be for a better reason. That line from the ISRO site said it right- this really is bigger than any single nation. These efforts are for the whole planet, and the whole human race.
Sources:
News October 22, 2008: “Russia and India Start Preparation of the Second Lunar Spacecraft” at the website of Russian Federal Space Agency: federalspace.ru/main.php?id=2&nid=4536&hl=chandrayaan-2
News January 24, 2009: “Exclusive Interview of Anatoly Perminov, Roscosmos Head, for Rossiiskaya Gazeta” at the website of Russian Federal Space Agency: federalspace.ru/main.php?id=2&nid=5263&hl=chandrayaan-2
Press Release November 14, 2007: “India and Russia Sign an Agreement on Chandrayaan-2″ at the website of Indian Space Research Organization: isro.org/pressrelease/scripts/pressreleasein.aspx?Nov14_2007
About ISRO: “Future Programme- Forthcoming Satellites” at the website of Indian Space Research Organization: isro.org/scripts/futureprogramme.aspx?Search=chandrayaan-2
“International Cooperations” at the website of Indian Space Research Organization: isro.org/scripts/internationalcooperations.aspx?Search=chandrayaan-2
Chandrayaan-2 entry at Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrayaan-2
“Chandrayaan: Lunar Mission by Indian Space Research Organization:” chandrayaan-i.com/index.php/chandrayaan-2.html
This time we’re going to look back at one of NASA’s most spectacular successes: the Chandra X-Ray Observatory. Launched by the space shuttle on July 23, 1999, Chandra has now far exceeded its originally projected lifetime, and still holds the distinction of being the most sophisticated X-ray observatory built to date. This single instrument has greatly added to our understanding of the universe, and when the history books of the future talk about these early days of space exploration, the Chandra Observatory is one of the names they will mention most fondly.
Before looking at the satellite, we should tip our hats to the man behind the name. Subramanyan Chandrasekhar was one of the foremost astrophysicists of the 20th century. While anything approaching a complete discussion of this man’s contributions to science would require several articles, we should acknowledge, in general, that he contributed some of the most fundamental ideas of modern astrophysics, and literally changed the entire field. He is widely regarded as the most influential thinker in this area since Albert Einstein. Unfortunately, Chandrasekhar died in 1995, and never got to see the success of the spacecraft that bears his name.
The Chandra Observatory, which is in a highly elliptical orbit around Earth, still holds several distinctions which remain unchallenged to this day. With a length of 45 feet, it is the largest satellite ever launched by the space shuttle. Chandra’s mirrors are the smoothest and most precisely aligned mirrors ever made. It has the highest resolution of any X-ray telescope, producing images 25 times sharper than those of its best predecessor.
Chandra’s telescope system consists of four pairs of mirrors with their support structure. X-ray particles have much more energy than photons of visible light, and would penetrate into a mirror’s surface if they hit it head-on. Because of this, it is necessary to turn the mirrors at an oblique angle to the direction the X-ray particles are traveling, which causes the particles to hit the surface and ricochet off. Thus the mirrors in Chandra are barrel-shaped rather than flat like conventional mirrors.
These mirrors focus the X-rays on a spot on the focal plane about half the width of a human hair. It is here that two instruments come into play, the High Resolution Camera (HRC) and the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS).
The HRC detects X-rays reflected from the mirror assembly, and is capable of taking images showing detail as small as one-half of an arc-second. This is the level of resolution that would be necessary to read a newspaper from a distance of half a mile. The HRC is especially useful for studying hot matter in the aftermath of stellar explosions, and in distant galaxy clusters, as well as identifying extremely faint X-ray sources.
The Advanced Charged Coupling Device Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) is a series of charged coupled devices, more advanced versions of the ones used in camcorders. With this instrument, scientists can produce images using X-rays made only by one chemical element. For instance, multiple images of a single object might be taken in the light of oxygen ions, neon ions and iron ions. It is ideally suited for studying temperature and chemical variations across huge clouds of interstellar gas.
There are two instruments on-board Chandra that are used for X-ray spectroscopy, the High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS) and the Low Energy Grating Spectrometer (LETGS). Each of these assemblies contains hundreds of gold gratings, which intercept the X-rays and diffract them as a prism diffracts visible light, separating them into individual X-ray lines. The resulting spectra allow analysis of the temperature, ionization and chemical composition of the source.
Using this unrivaled array of instruments, the Chandra Observatory has produced a staggering amount of science and images in its career. While a full discussion of this material would fill many books (and already has, no doubt) here we will present just a few of Chandra’s Greatest Hits:
1. Study of dark energy. A few years ago, scientists made a discovery that was completely unexpected: the universe’s expansion is speeding up. Before this discovery, it was assumed that the Big Bang had blown everything apart, and the expansion of the universe that we see today is that motion continuing. In that case, as the universe got bigger and bigger, it would lose energy and start to slow down. In other words, astronomical observations of very distant regions, which show things as they were in the early time of the universe, should show the universe expanding faster than it does today. Instead, it was found that the universe is expanding faster now than it was in earlier times, forcing scientists to conclude that some unknown force was making this expansion speed up. This force, which remains unknown today, is called dark energy. It seems to only come into play on a very large scale, since the attractive force of gravity obviously dominates on the local scale.
While we may not know what dark energy is, we now know something about what it does, thanks largely to Chandra. Observations from the observatory have shown us the action of dark energy in detail. For instance, observations of the galaxy cluster Abell 85, about 740 million light years from Earth, reveal that the predictable collapse of dust and gas that forms galaxies has been slowed down by the repulsive force of dark energy, stifling the growth of galaxies. By comparing the expected rate of collapse with the real, observed rate, we can quantify the repulsive force of dark energy. Chandra is ideally suited for observations of this nature, and when scientists finally figure out what this stuff is, their discovery will probably owe something to the data gathered by Chandra.
2. The “Hand of God” image. This one is an interesting scientific observation, and a humdinger of a picture, too. A tiny, dense pulsar only 12 miles wide is spinning madly and spraying energy in a huge pattern spanning 150 light years. Called PSR B1509-58, it spins about seven times a second. Its enormous release of energy is thought to stem from an extremely powerful magnetic field, estimated to be 15 trillion times as strong as Earth’s. As the pulsar’s wind of electrons and ions travels through the magnetized gas, it creates the elaborate nebula seen by Chandra. In the false-color image released by NASA, the X-rays with the lowest energy are red, those in the mid-range are green, and the ones with the highest energy are blue- a color scheme that makes for a dramatic image. The resulting picture bears an uncanny resemblance to a spread hand- hence, the name.
3. Clearest-ever image of the Crab Nebula. This one is similar to the last one, in that it is produced by a combination of an intense magnetic field and a rapidly-rotating pulsar. In this case, the resulting energy is spraying out jets of matter and anti-matter from the pulsar’s north and south poles, as well as an intense wind flowing from the middle region. In the image at the NASA website, the motivating pulsar is clearly visible, looking like the bull’s eye of a target surrounded by a shock wave generated when the pulsar’s emissions hit the surrounding nebular gas. The cloud surrounding the pulsar is twisted in elaborate swirls, which are actually tracing the lines of the nebula’s magnetic field. While the Crab Nebula has been observed many times before, this is the first time these lines could be seen so clearly.
4. Brightest supernova ever observed. In collaboration with ground-based telescopes, Chandra has taken pictures of the supernova SN 2006gy, which is the brightest and most energetic explosion ever recorded. In its spectacular death-throes, the original star expelled two lobes of gas before it exploded, and these show up as two lights of pale lavender in the Chandra image. The explosion has slammed into the surrounding gas, causing a shock wave that is producing some of the visible light. The rest of the visible light is made by debris that has been heated by radioactivity. This observation allowed astronomers to determine that the feature was definitely caused by the collapse of an extremely dense star, and not the collapse of a white dwarf star, an alternative theory that had been discussed.
The list goes on, and it’s not finished yet. Chandra, living up to its reputation, is still going strong, and will certainly give us a lot more great science. Having survived for more than twice its planned lifetime, it is a great example of a space project that has exceeded even the wildest dreams of its designers, and is still doing so. There is no reason to think that Chandra won’t keep going for years to come- and if the past is any indication, its achievements will be amazing and beautiful.
When they happen, you can read about them here, of course.
(Of course, you want to see this stuff, right? Please, hang out here for a while and enjoy our articles- but when you’re through doing that, go to the “10 Years of Chandra” address below and check out “Cool Stories From the Hot Universe.”)
Sources:
“Space Topics: Chandra X-Ray Observatory” at the website of the Planetary Society: planetary.org/explore/topics/space_missions/chandra/
“Chandra Feature 5-11-10: X-Ray Discovery Points to Location of Missing Matter” at the NASA website: nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/10-048.html
“Chandra X-Ray Observatory: CXC Operated for NASA by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory” at the Harvard website: chandra.harvard.edu/
“Chandra X-Ray Observatory: the Chandra Mission” at the Harvard website: chandra.harvard.edu/about/axaf_mission.html
“10 Years of Chandra” at the Harvard website: chandra.harvard.edu/ten/
Last month, NASA issued a statement saying that preparations for its Juno mission to Jupiter are proceeding well, and that everything is still on schedule for a launch in August of next year. This will be just one part of the invasion of Jupiter that will unfold over the next several years, which will subject the giant planet to more detailed scrutiny than ever before. In a previous article, we took a look at the Europa Jupiter System Mission (EJSM) which will be a huge production involving contributions from both NASA and the European Space Agency. This time, we will discuss a slightly smaller- but still quite impressive- project that will be undertaken by NASA: the Juno mission.
Jupiter is a great big question mark. Like the king of the gods for whom it is named, the giant planet dominates the solar system, surrounding itself with an entourage of moons and other attendants. The region of space all around Jupiter is filled with its gravitational field, its magnetic field and its zones of intense radiation. Its nearer moons are heated by the tidal force of its gravity, allowing them to have inner oceans of water (probably) and sometimes active volcanoes. Jupiter is our biggest gas giant planet, but we know from our observations of other planetary systems that there are others that are much bigger. These enormous planets, Jupiter and its big cousins, are really the main product of planet formation. They suck up most of the matter that surrounds a planet-forming star, and the crumbs that are left over form the lesser planets. Jupiter and its cloud of satellites are often called a mini-solar system, with good reason.
One of the main questions that Juno will attempt to answer is, exactly what is Jupiter? Is there a solid planet down there, or is it just a globe of gas? You will sometimes hear TV science programs saying that Jupiter has no solid body at its core, but the truth is, we just don’t know. Understanding that will tell us how the planet formed in the first place.
In its most basic form, the question we’re asking is this: did a rocky core form first, and then attract the rest of the matter around it to form the planet, or did an unstable region of the solar nebula collapse and trigger the planet’s formation? In the first case, the rocky core should still be there. In the second case, there will only be gas all the way through, and while it will be extremely compressed at the center of the planet, there will be no rocky core there.
And that’s only one of the topics Juno will be investigating. In the old myth, Jupiter made a cloud around himself to hide his misdeeds, but Juno was able to pull it aside and see within. Hopefully, the analogy will prove to be appropriate.
(Just a few days ago, NASA made an announcement that points out our lack of understanding of Jupiter and its atmosphere: one of the iconic stripes has disappeared from the lower hemisphere of the planet. Scientists confess that they are completely baffled by this event. When Juno gets there, perhaps it can suggest an explanation of how a feature that has “always” been there can suddenly disappear.)
The Juno probe will be launched in August, 2011, aboard an Atlas V-551 rocket from Cape Canaveral. The journey will take about five years, with the craft arriving at Jupiter in July of 2016. The projected mission time (which may be changed, as we know) is one Earth year. During that time, Juno will orbit Jupiter 32 times in a highly elliptical orbit that will bring it to within 3,000 miles of the planet at closest approach.
The specific goals of the Juno mission are:
1. Measure the amount of water in Jupiter’s atmosphere, which will help us figure out which theory of planetary formation is right, or if we need new theories.
2. Conduct in-depth study of Jupiter’s atmosphere, measuring composition, temperature, cloud motion, etc.
3. Make the first map of Jupiter’s gravity and magnetic fields, which should reveal the planet’s internal structure.
4. Specifically investigate Jupiter’s magnetosphere near the north and south poles, where enormous auroras occur that will hopefully give us new insights into how the planet’s magnetic field interacts with its atmosphere.
Like NASA’s previous Pioneer probes, Juno will spin on its axis to ensure stability and make aiming the craft easier. Immediately after launch, Juno will be spun up by the rocket motors of its second-stage booster, to which it will still be attached. When it enters Jupiter orbit, the spinning satellite will sweep space with its instruments once in each rotation. At three rotations per minute, this means that Juno’s instruments will sweep Jupiter 400 times in the two hours it takes the craft to circle from pole to pole.
Juno will be the first solar-powered satellite made to operate so far from the sun. Since Jupiter receives 25 times less sunlight than Earth, Juno will need three extra-large solar panels to provide sufficient energy. These panels will be folded flat against the sides of the probe during launch. When deployed, they will extend outward from the hexagonal body, giving the craft a span of more than 20 meters.
Thanks to recent technological advances in the field of solar power, Juno’s panels will be 50 percent more efficient and radiation tolerant than solar panels that were used just 20 years ago. The mission needs only small amounts of electricity, since it will only be in use for about six hours out of each 11-day orbit of Jupiter. (Juno will be in a highly elliptical orbit, and will only be observing the planet during its closest approach.) Once it is in its working orbit, Juno will be in total sunlight for the duration of the mission; there will be no time when it is in Jupiter’s shadow.
There are zones of intense radiation around Jupiter which could easily fry the electronics of a space probe, so Juno will have all of its sensitive innards in a shielded vault. Juno is the first space probe to use such heavy shielding, and scientists will be watching carefully to see how well it works. This line of research is relevant to future missions, since the harsh radiation of space is potentially harmful both to unmanned probes, and to the human crews that will eventually follow them. To hedge its bets, Juno will try to avoid the worst areas of radiation by making its approaches to Jupiter over the planet’s north pole, dropping below the radiation belts, and then exiting over the south pole.
The smaller planets of the solar system have all seen extensive changes to their atmospheres during their lifetimes. For instance, we now know that the atmospheres of both Mars and Venus were very different in their early days. (See our articles on the Mars Express and Venus Express missions.) But Jupiter, with its enormous gravity, has probably held onto all of the gas that it had at its formation. Planetary scientists will be very interested in studying the big planet’s atmosphere to see what it can tell us about the matter that was around in the solar system’s youth. Juno will be able to observe that atmosphere in greater detail than ever before, seeing the global structure and motion of gases below the cloud tops for the first time, and mapping variations in the composition, temperature and patterns of motion down to unprecedented depths.
Jupiter has the brightest auroras in the solar system, and Juno will actually take samples of charged particles as it flies over the poles. Its study of the auroras and the magnetic fields that produce them should increase our understanding of Jupiter and of all other powerful sources of magnetism, such as young stars with their own planetary systems.
So, those are some of the things that Juno will tell us about Jupiter. This is really basic science, the kind of preliminary investigation that should pave the way for more complex enterprises in the future. In fact, the mission overview at the NASA website points out that no new technology had to be invented for this mission. It uses tried-and-true instruments that gather basic information- the kind of stuff that can tell us fundamental things about this giant planet, and about the beginnings of our solar system.
Juno will be launched in August of next year- and of course, you can read all about it here.
Sources:
“Juno: Unlocking Jupiter’s Mysteries” at the NASA website: nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/main/index.html
“Juno Mission Overview” at the NASA website: nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/overview/index.html
“Juno: Spacecraft and Instruments” at the NASA website: nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/spacecraft/index.html
“Juno Mission News: Juno Taking Shape in Denver” at the NASA website:
nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/news/juno20100405.html
In this article, we’ll take a look at gravity waves, one of the most fascinating and revolutionary ideas in astronomy. Specifically, we will talk about the LISA mission, a future project which will be a collaboration between NASA and the ESA. LISA, a single instrument composed of three spacecraft orbiting the sun, will be the first of a new generation of gravity-wave telescopes that will allow us to see the universe through new eyes. Whenever this happens, it always shows us things that we had never seen before. Gravity-wave astronomy is a window that is just opening, and LISA and its descendants are the instruments that will open it for us.
Space is often imagined as being empty. It is referred to as “the void,” and is called a vacuum. The implication is that the space between the heavenly bodies is a whole lot of nothing with a bit of dust and gas here and there.
Well, by now we know just how wrong this is. Space is absolutely teeming with bits of this and that, ranging from loose molecules to sizable chunks. Besides that, there are also dark matter and dark energy, which fill up much of what we once thought to be empty space. Obviously, the term “void” doesn’t even apply here.
But consider something else: what about space itself? If you could create a chamber and draw everything out of it- all the matter, energy and everything else- would it really be empty? This question is hard for us to grasp because we, being creatures of matter ourselves, are quite matter-centric in our outlook on the world. No, that’s not a real word, but you know what I mean. We tend to think that matter (and energy, which is just another form of the same thing, as Einstein said) is everything, and if there isn’t any matter or energy present in an area of space, we call it “empty.”
But Einstein had this idea that space itself is something. Even if you could get all of the matter and energy out of our hypothetical chamber, it still wouldn’t be empty. It would contain the space itself. Space, in this view of the universe, is a weird, rubbery substance, the shape of which is influenced by the presence of matter.
There’s a popular analogy that is sometimes used to illustrate this. Imagine a sheet of rubber that’s stretched out tight, like the head of a drum. That’s space. Now put something heavy on it- let’s say, a wet rock called Earth- and watch what happens to the rubber. Not surprisingly, it dips downward, and the wet rock ends up sitting in a depression in the rubber. Now, if you roll a smaller rock toward the big one, it will come to the edge of the depression, go over that edge, and roll into the big rock. (Whoa! The residents of Earth are having a very bad day! See our article on Near Earth Objects from a few weeks ago.) On the other hand, we can also imagine a state in which the smaller rock spins constantly around the edge of the depression, moving just fast enough to keep from falling in, but not fast enough to roll away. If it’s moving a little faster than that, it may just whiz right by, but its path will be bent by the edge of the depression.
The concept that is being illustrated here is this: gravity is not a form of radiant energy, like heat or light. Rather, it is an actual change in the configuration of space caused by the presence of matter. A chunk of matter literally warps the shape of the space around it, making a depression. More massive objects cause deeper depressions, which can only be escaped by a tremendous expenditure of energy. Objects that come too close, and are not moving fast enough to escape, fall into the depression. This is the force we think of as gravity.
Now, here’s the crucial point that makes gravity wave astronomy possible: when an extremely big event involving very massive objects occurs, it makes ripples in the rubber. For instance, when two black holes collide, it sets space rippling in a regular pattern of waves that may go on for a long time, and cover enormous distances.
Those ripples are gravity waves. If you have an instrument of sufficient sensitivity, you might be able to measure these waves, and perhaps learn something about the original event that caused them. If you studied them for a while, you might be able to compile a table of gravity wave signatures for different types of events. For instance, you might learn that the collision of two black holes causes this particular pattern of gravity waves, and that certain minute variations reveal specific facts about the source, such as the relative masses of the black holes and the angle at which they approached each other. If you got really good at it, and had extremely sensitive instruments, you might be able to learn quite a bit about events that happened far away in both space and time, just by measuring their gravity waves.
LISA is the beginning of that kind of study. It will be able to simultaneously measure the amplitude, direction and polarization of gravity waves. For the first time, scientists will be able to test theories by comparing them with actual measurements.
LISA is considered a single instrument, but that instrument will be composed of three separate spacecraft, spaced so that they form the points of an equilateral triangle five million km. on a side. This triangle will face the sun at an angle of 60 degrees to the plane of Earth’s orbit, moving with Earth around the sun. In effect, this will give us a space telescope that is five million km. wide.
That’s necessary because this rubbery stuff called space is quite stubborn, and even the most enormous events cause only slight movement in it. The waves may also be very long and slow, making them hard to detect. To get maximum sensitivity, you need a very big telescope- the bigger, the better.
Well, five million km. is pretty big, and should allow us to detect a lot of gravity waves. Here’s how it’s done:
Each of the three satellites will contain two telescopes accompanied by lasers and optical systems. Pointing in directions 60 degrees apart, the telescopes in each satellite will communicate with those in the other two satellites by laser beam. Inside each telescope is a four-centimeter-wide, free-floating cube of gold-platinum alloy, which is used as a reflector for the incoming laser beams. This provides a reference for measuring the distance between spacecraft. When a gravity wave moves through the observation field, it literally changes the shape of space so that there is a slight change in the distance between the satellites. By measuring this change, the strength, direction and polarization of the wave can be derived.
This method is so precise, even the pressure of sunlight on the satellites can alter their position in relation to each other, spoiling the measurement. Because of this, the LISA satellites will have to constantly monitor such extraneous forces and counteract them with their electric thrusters.
These thrusters will only be used after the spacecraft have reached their final orbits. The actual job of getting them there will be handled by other means. The three spacecraft will be launched together on one Atlas V launcher. Once they have left the launch vehicle, they will independently move to their respective positions around the sun using propulsion modules, which will be jettisoned before the science mission begins. The full journey, from launch until the three craft are in their working orbits, will take one year.
In some cases, space probes are able to start making observations before they actually reach their destinations, often sending back useful data months or even years before their mission officially begins. Unfortunately, that will not be possible here, since LISA is a single instrument, and will be completely non-functional until all the units are in place.
The frequency range that LISA can “see” is determined by the distance between the satellites. This frequency range has been chosen carefully to facilitate the study of the most interesting sources of gravity waves, massive black holes and binary stars.
While the LISA mission is still under consideration by both the ESA and NASA, we can already get a pretty good idea of the kinds of things it will be observing. Some of the best candidates are binary systems, in which two stars orbit each other. This spinning motion should generate a pattern of gravity waves that will be easily identifiable. At first, some of the objects LISA will study will probably be things that have already been observed by other means. Good candidates include X-ray binaries, neutron-star binaries, black-hole binaries and helium cataclysmic variables.
We have already mentioned black hole collisions, and the biggest of these are the super-massive black holes, whose collisions are the most powerful generators of gravity waves in the universe. Observation of these events will provide an opportunity to test general relativity and particularly black hole theory with an accuracy never possible before.
In general, the LISA mission could be regarded as just one part of a larger effort to look at the universe using means other than visible light. As we have seen in past articles, there is a big push going on right now, trying to expand our view of the events around us into wavelengths that have not been studied before. By expanding into gravity waves, astronomers are looking at the world of extremely low-frequency wavelengths. If past experience is any indication, this will reveal things we have never seen before, and teach us things about our universe that we would never have learned by any other method.
When that happens, you can read about it here. Stick with us, and we’ll tell you all about it.
Sources:
ESA Space Science: “LISA Factsheet- Detecting Gravitational Waves” at website of European Space Agency: esa.int/esaSC/SEM5TDWO4HD_index_0.html
ESA Space Science: LISA Overview at the website of European Space Agency: esa.int/esaSC/120376_index_0_m.html
ESA Space Science: “What is Gravity?” at the website of the European Space Agency: esa.int/esaSC/SEMDYI5V9ED_index_0.html
ESA Space Science: “Gravitational Waves- ‘Dents’ in Space-Time” at website of the European Space Agency: esa.int/esaSC/SEMLY2T1VED_index_0.html